Don Imus controversy raises issues about inconsistent principles

by

Don Imus was one of the America’s leading radio talk show hosts. His show was also simulcast on MSNBC TV each morning. He reportedly has an audience of many millions. And he clearly is one of the country’s most outraegous racists I have ever heard.

This past week, Imus found himself in hot water when he described the African American female members of the Ritgers Basketball team as “nappy-haired hos.” It is an obnoxious, racist phrase. These young women were near champions and were involved in a playoff game in which they excelled, although did not win their championship. Instead of neing held up as role models, Imus used the women as a platform to once again spew his hateful racist views.

And where the morality of what should be an obvious problem comes apart at the seems.

  • The term “nappy-haired hos” is a street vernacular often used by Black rap artists, who use even worse language to describe their own people.
  • Imus has made even more vilgar comments about many other non-White people and other non-Christians, and yet no one has ever made an issue of the controversies before. Why now? Because the targets are African American?
  • I’m not defending Imus at all. I am not saying the public shouldn’t outraged when a widely broadcast radio talkshow host says something ignorant on the airwaves. I am saying though that morality doesn’t have a skin color. It doesn’t have an ethnicity. And principles do not have boundaries.

    Why was the public not equally outraged when Imus and his sidekick writers and coi-hosts attacked Arabs on the air as “animals, animals?” Or when Imus referred to the Suha Arafat, wife of the late Palestinian President Yasir Arafat, during Arafat’s funeral as “that fat pig of a wife?”

    Why was the public not outraged when Imus made anti-Semitic comments about Jews controlling CBS? Or other ethnic slurs against Asians, Muslims and Hispanics?

    Is morality in America the right of only those who have the most clout?

    African Americans certainly have more clout than Arab Americans. Had Imus called Arabs “nappy-haired hos,” or “sand niggers,” would his future be more secure today?

    African American leaders are complaining not only about Imus, but about the use of racist terms by African American rappers and hip-hop artists. But no one has punished anyone the way they are punishing Imus.

    Although he was suspended from his job effective next week (that’s astonishing that it was immediate), I believe Don Imus should be fired. he should be fired immediately, without any hesitation. He should have been fired years ago. Suddenly, though, the controversy has forced him to issue repeated apologies. Are they sincere, or merely his belief that by apologizing he can save his million dollar salary, his job and his prestigious post as a national American radio commentator and TV talk show host?

    His advertisers are removing their ads. Why? Because they suddenly feel Don Imus is a racist, or because they are more concerned with how the ocntroversy might impact their sales revenues? In otherwords, as long as no one complained, the advertisers didn’t care what Imus said on his radio and MSNBC TV show.

    I believe Americans need to look within themselves, really review their own conduct. Americans are the most educated people in the world, but the least educated about the world. Their education or lack of education on subjects seems to drive what they believe, what they support, and what they feel is inappropriate conduct and what can be ignored.

    Imus is a problem.

    But the bigger problem is with the American people who seem to pick and choose when morality and principle should apply.

    – Ray Hanania
    www.hanania.com