When mainstream or ethnic humor crosses the line in journalism and entertainment
Here’s the presentation I made this morning at the Asian American journalists Association (AAJA) convention in Miami, Florida:
Asian American Journalists Association
“When Humor Crosses the line in Journalism and Entertainment”
Saturday, August 4, 2007 Hyatt Regency Miami
Panelists
Ray Hanania, Moderator (Columnist, standup comedian, www.hanania.com)
Emil Guillermo, Asian Week Columnist, humorist (www.AMOK.com)
Tina Kim, former TV broadcaster, standup comedienne (www.TinaKim.com)
A gun only becomes a weapon when it is pointed at someone.
In much the same way, humor can become a weapon when it is pointed at someone, too.
Today, we’re going to talk about humor and how it is and should be used in journalism, and in entertainment. And when we try to distinguish between journalism and entertainment, we might use the analogy of distinguishing between a real gun used in a crime, and a fake gun used in a Hollywood fantasy.
Humor is a very powerful way to grab an audience’s attention in a column or a newspaper story. Sometimes, though, the humor can hurt.
In standup comedy, humor can make a very powerful statement about politics, society and every topic under the sun.
I think the real issue is not just simply the words that make up a joke, but rather the context of a joke. Are you laughing with someone? Or, are you laughing at someone.
It makes a difference.
We often hear people say that African Americans can poke fun at themselves and say things that might otherwise sound racist when said by someone else who is not Black.
That is true for any race, nationality, ethnicity or religion. Yet, race, nationality, ethnicity and religion all play a major role in our society and impact how we think as a people and the opinions we express.
I’ve have been a journalist for 32 years and last year was named “Best Ethnic American Columnist” by the New America Media. But sometime during the 1980s, as a reporter covering Chicago’s City Hall, I was transformed from a reporter and a columnist to an “Arab American” columnist.
If I wrote a column on my ethnic background, I was considered biased. I struggled with that problem for years and finally decided I will brand myself as a Palestinian or Arab American columnist to take away the edge of criticism associated with being branded by someone else.
But after Sept. 11, 2001, being Arab American became a crime. People looked at me and blamed me for the terrorism. People read my columns and accused me of being anti-American. They said I was not patriotic, even though I served during the Vietnam War, my brother was a U.S. Marine and my father and uncle both served in during World War II.
Suddenly, the awards meant nothing and it became harder and harder to find work in journalism. After all, how many of the nation’s 4,500 newspapers would hire an Arab American columnist for their newspapers.
After Sept. 11, a woman came to me and said, “I can’t believe you abandoned your Christian faith to become an Arab.” I realized then, and after weeks of being called “Ray-Qaeda” in letters and emails, that I had to do something more than just write reasoned columns that offered common sense about the Middle East, about Arabs and about Muslims to the American people.
I recognize that Americans are the most educated people in the world but the least educated about the world. Many Americans can’t tell the difference between a Pakistani and a Palestinians, an Iranian and an Indian, a good president and a moron.
So, I decided to enter standup comedy. I know that humor can change how people view Arabs and Muslims, especially humor that has an educating aspect to it. Standup comedy is not just about making people laugh, but also about making people laugh at the very difficult issues that we face as a people.
Some of the comedy is self-deprecating. I can make fun of being Arab American because I am Arab American. I can even make fun of Jewish people in the very strict context of the fact that I am Palestinian and my wife and son are Jewish.
(Sample Comedy Routine using various forms of humor: ethnic, social satire, self-deprecating, political, slice-of-life).
Yet, the world has become a very blurry place. Reason has been replaced by insanity. Common sense has become too expensive for the average American.
Humor and standup comedy has transformed from a form of entertainment into a weapon. We’re not always laughing with each other. We are laughing at each other. Humor has become a weapon in the loose, carefree environment of cable TV talk. It has been running wild and driven by demagoguery on talk radio for years before.
I was most offended by Don Imus when he referred to the women of the Rutger’s Basketball team as “nappy headed hoes.” I’m not Black, but what really upset me beyond the racism was the defense of Imus that was being used. Suddenly, Imus was being portrayed as a “shock Jock,” a term that was used almost exclusively to describe Howard Stern.
He was described as an on-air comedian, when in fact he tried to portray himself as a mainstream serious commentator.
What offended me the absolute most was that Don Imus often used racist terms and phrases to describe Arabs and Muslims and no one ever said a word of complaint.
But, let’s face it, this is a racist country. But it is stratified racism. There is a hierarchy to the racism and the victims of racism, just as there are color shades and levels of distinction when we address diversity in our American news rooms.
We cannot talk about the travesties of racist humor without talking about the rampant racism that takes place in this country. We have to address disease not the symptoms. Racist humor is the weapon of racists.
We must address the fact that in our American society today, Americans have come to accept some races and embraced them in the context of diversity, but there is a glass wall, a line that is in sand that casts Arabs, Muslims and anyone from the Middle East as an acceptable target of racism, racist humor and racist jokes.
As Asian American journalists, many of you have the moral shield to confront the racism that targets you. But we cannot simply put an ethnic or racial face to the victims of racist humor. Racist humor really goes beyond one racial group, one ethnicity and even one religion. Racist humor impacts us all. And we have to stand up to speak out against all racist humor, regardless of when the targets are the “US” are are the “THEMS.”
And it is not just racism in humor.
As journalists, we must be allowed to push the envelope of controversies as far as possible. We must be able to address, discuss and write about every issue, including the most disgusting. Free speech and freedom of expression are important because it assumes rightly that the person hearing the speech has the intelligence and common sense to determine what is and what is not appropriate.
I am not against Don Imus being a racist. I am not against anyone using racist language in their entertainment, their writings or their broadcast appearances.
What I am against is the hypocrisy and double standards of our society which views one form of racism as unacceptable, and another as an everyday obligation.
The fact that Don Imus used racist terms to describe the mostly Black women of the Rutger’s Basketball team is wrong. But even more wrong is that somehow, that racism is worse than racism we see, read and hear every day about Arabs and even about Asian Americans.
Of course, I’m not just Ray Hanania, award winning columnist. I am that “Arab American columnist” that so few American newspapers are afraid to publish.
Why wouldn’t I say all this?
Now, I’d like to introduce our first presenter …
I will ask you to hold your questions until the end. We do plan to leave time to take questions and engage in a discussion that we hope will continue on the AAJA web site.
Final points:
– Ray Hanania

Join the Conversation
“A gun only becomes a weapon when it is pointed at someone.”
Huh? What is it when it’s not pointed at someone, Ray, a table, a chair, a dog, a cat, what???? A gun is designed to be a weapon, to fire a metal projectile at a relatively high speed, that can be aimed at a target, an animal being hunted, or some idiot who broke into your home and is endangering your family by his having a gun aimed at your wife, children or you. A gun in your hand, aimed at anything, is still a gun and a weapon, period.
Similarly, humor is humor, period. Emotions and hurt feelings are completely under the control of the person showing the emotions…anger, fear, hatred, love, are all emotions and we as humans can control them.
America is not a nation built on race. America is a nation built on self rule that was initially populated with Europeans from England and other countries who formed the laws of this country. It is NOT built on race, sir, it is built on principles and values.
Yes stereotypes are simple definitions but surely not “answers”. Name calling whether it’s calling a black a nigger or a person who makes a comment about somone who is a member of a race not Caucasian a “racist”…for blacks are never called racists when they call another black person a nigger…
You seem to like creating categories and definitions, racist, some descriptive other than “weapon” for a gun, and a shallow view of what America is.
Basically Ray, regardless of awards you’ve received, you’re pretty much full of shit.
Joe
Thanks Joe … nice to know your logic falls apart when you can;t make a good argument
A gun is NOT a weapon when it is sitting there like a clump of metal. Sorry pal. In every example you gave as a “weapon,” it was pointed at someone so THANKS for proving me right.
I wouldn’t say you’re full of shit because that would be too complimentary
Or, maybe you are one of those gung-ho military dudes who screams “Loe it or leave it” … “Iraq is al-Qaeda” … bus is afraid to join the military yourself? Just guessing but probably right on the nail
Oh, and here is some Arabic to learn … Shukran means thank you. You;ll need to learn it because THE AY-RABS ARE TAKING OVER AMERICA …. JEEEEEEEEEEE- HAH-D!
Ray Hanania
http://www.hanania.com
You go, Joe!
I was amazed to turn on Comedy Central a little while ago and see/hear Chris Rock do a routine that was far, far over the top of anything Imus ever did. And the only thing Comedy Central bleeped out was the naughty words.
And that was fine with me – Chris Rock was making a point that only the thought/humor impaired would miss. Just like the points Imus would make. I also remember a time when Imus’s ratings were slipping, and Imus said wistfully, “The interviews with writers and politicians don’t perk up my ratings, this isn’t NPR. What makes the ratings go up is when Sid or Bernie act up.” The public knew what it wanted. I wish the public was more mature – but then we would get better politicians elected.
I am sorry that Ray Hanania had a hard, undeserved time after 9/11, but I don’t see any signs of any special insight coming from that experience.
Chris Rock, if you read my comments, is a good example of someone talking about “himself,” his experience. He isn’t someone who makes casual remarks bashing other ethnic and racial or religious groups, as Don Imus has and continued to do up until he ran into the brick wall of Rev. Al Sharpton.
In reality, had Imus made his comments about Asians, maybe Asians would have complained, but that would have been it. We all know that when Imus crossed the line on racial inapropriateness, that his “error” was targeting a powerful racial minority.
It’s a reflection on the challenges still facing Asian American journalists and others who have been the constant targets of Imus’ exploitive racist hate but yet who could nothing in response.
As I said, Imus had a right to express his racist views. And I and others had the right to demand that he be fired.
Of course, I don’t think David Why would feel the same way regarding the coverage of the young Asian man who went on a killing spree at Virginia Tech and the fact that his race was a part of the story, at least initially until it was later determined in media coverage whether his rage stemmed from his experiences as an Asian American — he seemed the victim of anti-Asian racism, as it turns out — or just a young man who went off the deep end and blamed others for his suffering.
Thanks for writing and sharing your comments
Ray Hanania
http://www.hanania.com
Yeah, principles made by the white man, and other white men..
Did these principles enlist : Fight native owners of this continent like the plague and take over? or import help from other poor nations to serve our “holy” purpose in the new world? Where’s the principles in values there, if it’s only one race being better than the other.. Or is it for the money and land to give to one race over the other?
America, since then and until modern history, had problems getting more than one race under their flag because their “whity” rules and values, and like many racists there claim, “those chings and mohammadians got us to worse states than we were with the niggers”..
Hmm, you’d think it’s an excerpt from a history book, but it’s actually said in 2005..
I ask of you, do you really believe that race had no effect in creating America?
I can’t agree with you about Imus, “but, he (Imus) had the right to express his views.” I would agree if he’d actually been presenting some sort of position or argument, but it seems he was just slinging insults. If some KKK jerk wants to make a speech about the benefits of segregation that’s free speech, simple name-calling isn’t. Now, Imus’s remark would have been acceptable in the context of shock radio, but as you pointed out that was an excuse used after the fact.
I don’t understand this part: “As I said, Imus had a right to express his racist views. And I and others had the right to demand that he be fired.” If you think he did had a 1st Amendment right to make his remarks then you have no right to shut him up.
This is just a side issue, but a gun is always a weapon, it only becomes a threat when it is pointed at someone. A pistol locked in a drawer is no threat, but it is still a weapon.
I don’t have to agree with you 100% to think it was an excellent presentation. I like what you said about the beneficial and destructive uses of humor, about stereotypes, and about acceptable/unacceptable racism in America.
Say, Lou, who are you quoting there?
Specify which quote are you “aiming” at Grumpy..
Lou:
Grumpy..
Am quoting an average Texan joe.. I knew about this Mohammadian term (didn’t know it before) from a friend of mine in Aramco who used to live in Texas, and got back there post 9/11 and told his neighbor “the quoted someone” that she lives in Saudi.. I guess that Texan is just saying how FOREIGNERS are making life in the states more complicated like it did back when the whole black racism was the “hip” thing around..
Any more questions?
*calls his lawyer incase grumpy pulls another verbal trap
*
I found your whole piece to be very well written. I am however still upset that the man that I choose to listen to for thirty plus years was taken off the air for presenting a comedy bit that didn’t work. If one was to listen to the entire bit Imus and Bernie were attempting to draw a correlation between the differences in how Rutgers and Tennessee approached the game and their appearance. Since Imus and I were one of the few people who actually watched the women’s NCAA tournament, I found his statements very poignant since the women of Rutgers played a very hard nose game and have a reputation for rough play. Similar to the old Detroit Pistons Boston Celtics games back in the eighties the games between Rutgers and Tennessee and UCONN were examples of two different styles of play. Anyone who follows NCAA women’s BB knows that Rutgers had a reputation for pushing the boundaries when it came to physical play. Imus was trying to point that out and made a few rough comments trying to be hip to the jive like he always did. It wasn’t meant as a racist comment and only those who are not regular listeners to the show would think that. So basically my morning show was taken off the air because a group of people who don’t even listen to the show and others who had a vested interest in getting the man, who was challenging the administration and the pharmaceutical industries, off the air decided I had no right to listen to the most highly awarded Morning radio show host on the air, because they felt he was out of line. This entire episode was nothing more then very powerful people who saw an opportunity to shut-up a man that was a major irritant to their agenda and using the outrage of Sharpton and his gang as a means to their end. All this other malarkey is just window dressing. As D.L. Hugely said we have more important issues to discuss and deal with then what some old white cowboy said on the air. I find it amusing that they are replacing Imus on both stations with MMMMMM. Middle aged white guys who are of a conservative bent….and the beat goes on.
The term “Mohammadian” goes back to Colonial times, at least (I remember Jefferson using it).