The Mahdi

by Jahanshah Rashidian (Iran/Germany)

August 19th, 2007
16 Comments

Non-intellectually, people infuse their beliefs with reference to holy figures, legends and myths. There is a subtle side of depth psychology from these different forms of figurations to the appearance of religions. People like and need to believe in this spectrum, even if it is intellectually in contrast to their maturity.

One of these mythical legends is known as the Mahdi, Twelver Imam, The Hidden Imam, Hojjat or other names, who according to Shiite sect has disappeared more than one thousand years ago and will return at the end of time to lead an era of justice in the world.

The idea of the Mahdi appears to be a development in the first 2-3 centuries of Islam. In the case of the Shiite Mahdi, many scholars have suggested that there is a clear inspiration coming from the Messiah-figure of Christianity and its ideas of a judgement day in the hands of a religious saviour.

Although, there are many similar idea between the Mahdi and Messiah, the Mahdi precedes the second appearance of Jesus. He establishes justice, peace and truth throughout the world by establishing Islam as the global religion.

The first use of the term “Mahdi” is in 686 CE, by the Muslim leader Mukhtar Thaqafi, for Muhammad Ibn Hanafiya. The Arabic term “Mahdi” is translated with “divinely guided”. The figure of Mahdi, and his mission, is not mentioned in the Koran, or in the reliable Hadiths (Sahih).

There are several definitions of the Mahdi in Sunni Islam, but there is no such an importance as one can see it in Shiite sect. While Shiites believe that The Mahdi is the son of the 11Th Shiite Imam, Hassan al-Askari and a Byzantine princess, and he was born in 868, still alive in occultation, for Sunni, the Mahdi is not yet born, he will be born in Madina and his father’s name will be Abdullah.

There are also many variations over the Mahdi, which have differed from time to time and from region to region. Many tales speak of his visualisation, hidden places, contact people and his future plans against demonic spirit guides.

The Mahdi disappeared in 878. Although probably kidnapped and killed by the Abbasid Caliph, was believed by his followers to have gone into deathless “Occultation”, preparing to return as “the Mahdi”, the guide.

However, according to his believers, he is not a myth, like ancient gods, goddesses, fables, or any product of psycho-mythology, to which Gustav Jung, an Australian psychoanalyst, was interested, but a real existing guide.

The Twelver Imam firstly became a political figure used by the Safavids to establish the first Shiite-based Dynasty in Iran. The Safavid Dynasty established their dynasty in 1501 at Tabriz where they imposed Shiite identity on this Turkish speaking region to morally separate them from the Sunni, mighty Othman Empire.

The Shah Ismaiil Safavid was the first to set up an Islamic army based on the unifying and militant Shiite nationalism, propagating that defending the Shiite dynasty against the Sunnite Othman Empire was of the utmost importance of a religious duty for the Shiites.

To divinise their dynasty, the Safavids invented the spectacular idea that the Shiite kings are the deputies of the Hidden Imam. So, the dynasty justified its despotism by acquiring a sanctuary status: it is sinful to criticise the king or his rule.

A religious state by historical customs is another frame of logic. It pretends to bother about people’s sins; its only duty is to punish people committing such sins. The Shiite states, mostly assigned by the Hidden Imam from the Safavids on along with the plague of the Islamic Republic of Iran, became a divine verdict against all “sinful” attitutes of ,not-dociled, people.

Under the Pahlavi regime, the effects of the mythical allegations were different. Reza Shah imitated the then secular leaders, like Atatürk and Hitler. He was not interested in having the Twelver Imam’s mission to justify his dictatorship.

Later, his megalomaniac son, Muhammad Reza Shah, publicly alleged that he was in contact with some Shiite legends, but was not apparently satisfied with the, humble, position of the Imam’s deputy; instead he promoted his status as the shadow of God on the Earth and finally and impiously entitled himself “Aryamehr” (the sun of Aryans) .

In 1848, it had already been more than 9 centuries since the Occultation, and the reappearance of the Hidden Imam was to be expected. Various figures appeared as the Imam, including the Bab, from whom the Bahai faith is derived without a political weight.

The legacy of the power-hungry and doctrinal authority in Iranian Schism finally became Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the IRI. He was not personally believed to be the Hidden Imam like the Bab, but was thought to communicate with him.

A new version of the Imam’s myth is now sporadically shown by Ahamadinejad. The president of the IRI, who has an infamous record for his role in the IRI’s death squads, torture, terrorism and all kinds of Islamist and extreme right tendencies. He is now embroiled in many bizarre stories and rumours circulating about his relations with the Hidden Imam.

As for the Hidden Imam, it seems that the Imam will not be quite as hidden as might be. The president believes that he has been assigned to pave the way for his reappearance. The president has even last year during his speech at the UN, where he was allegedly surrounded and protected by a “divine light”, called for the Imam’s reappearance.

Trough these allegations, he is not only trying to gain a holy status among those who do not attribute him a charismatic personality, but also likely prepare some conditions for his future divine mission.

The next years will be probably marked by increasing tensions between the devoted followers of the Hidden Imam following controversial views about the date and conditions of Imam’s reappearance.

The president, who is known for his personality disorder, boasts of being assigned to prepare all conditions for the Imam’s return, which will be according to the Shiite sect after the following signs:

- Before the Imam’s appearance, the people will be reprimanded for their acts of disobedience by a fire that will appear in the sky and a redness that will cover the sky. It will swallow up both Baghdad and Kufa. People’s blood will cover their destroyed houses. Death will occur amid their people and a fear will come over the people of Iraq from which they will have no rest.

This is apparently a reason for the IRI’s nuclear programme to blow in jets of fire and plumes of smoke.

- There will be an insurgence by the Sufyani, a descendent of Abu Sufyan, who was one of the Muhammad’s enemy, along with his son, Muawiya and his Muawiya’s son, ,Yazid, which starts from Palestine and Jordan, and his reign of tyranny will span the Middle East from Iraq to Egypt.

- A loud call from the sky should announce the Hidden Imam’s reappearance.

In such an apocalyptic world, since the main characteristic of the Mahdi is that he is absolutely guided by God, the IRI, as a part of the divine scenario, has nothing of a normal state, it is a God’s handpicked guidance for the Muslims, and its acts are in complete accordance to God’s will .

The IRI, which already established a God’s state in Iran, now, at the best, prefers to have the Hidden Imam embodied by one of its protagonists for the rest of the rest of the region.

A strong current within the IRI called Hojatieh, referring to Hojjat or another name of the Imam in Farsi, spread the idea that since the Mahdi’s reappearence is demanded, we have to infict sever, unfair, and repressive conditions to accelerate his reappearance.

However, these conditions precede another amount of crimes, which are underway, when the alleged Twelver Imam, the Madi, can bloodily exceed many times more than these of the IRI’s scores.

BOOKMARK THIS ARTICLE

related posts

Omid

August 19, 2007

I will be responding here with some thought…stay tuned.

Mohammad M. (Iran)

August 19, 2007

well-done!
and I also repeat that: “I will be responding here with some thought…stay tuned.”
(though my response will be somehow different from Omid’s, who seems to try to defend Bahai faith, as I remember from his history in Mideast).

serendip

August 19, 2007

Here is the historical/political and economic reason behind reviving or manufacturing Persian version of Shi’ism:

http://www.ghandchi.com/128-AboutSafavids.htm

Jahanshah Rashidian (Iran/Germany)

August 19, 2007

Serendip

The Safavid Dynasty (1502-1722), bloodily imposed Shi’ism as the state religion on Iran instead of Sunnism, the then major religion. The Dynasty used Shi’itsm in Iran as a means of preserving Iranian national identity to target at the Sunni Ottoman Empire.

Ever since, the new faith became a political tool of the ruling class. This atmosphere of extreme religiosity rendered the country into a permanent quagmire of stagnation and backwardness.

The Shi’ism showed its effective results when the West could progress by sweeping or reforming their religion, whereas Iran just became a new reactionary Shiite regime.

Fariborz (Iran)

August 19, 2007

Jahanshah,

I read your “The Mahdi” article in a msn group and I enjoyed it alot. It’s very informative. Thank you very much.

Finnpundit

August 19, 2007

Yes, Jananshah, a very good post. Most informative.

Omid T (Iran/USA)

August 19, 2007

Muhammad was right, I will be discussing, just for informative purposes, the Baha’i perspective. I wont go into great detail but here are some links if any one wants to understand how Baha’is justify Seyyid Ali Muhammad, The Bab, as the Mehdi.

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3

Religious and theological views aside. I find it very ironic that not only do IRI clerics and administrators plan and look forward to the return of the Imam, but so do other government’s. The return of Christ, is a big part of right wing and conservative ideology. Could the argument be made that foreign policy decisions have been made on both sides based on apocalyptic hopes? No pun intended, but God help us.

Jahanshah Rashidian (Iran/Germany)

August 19, 2007

No Religion Is Rooted in Divinity

Dear Omid

I expressed once all my solidarity with Bahais because of barbaric repression of the IRI against them. This is the same solidarity that people once had with Jews who were the victims of another totalitarian regime.

So, apart of this humanistic solidarity, I do not believe that any religion has roots in divinity.
At best, a religion, faith, or sect can relatively better explain some general questions, but it still remains a product of human; it reflexts others phenomena, anything but not a divine mission

Omid T (Iran/USA)

August 19, 2007

And I express my solidarity for your right to have that belief. =-)

Believing in the divinity of religion is certainly an age old question. Is it simply the “opiate of the masses”, as described by Marx, or, could we all be part of some plan that does involve what we consider to be abhorrent and cruel acts inflicted by, gotta love this quote from the movie Constantine, “God, a mean kid with a magnifying glass” in an effort, in a process of development and realization of a reality that is in this world unattainable through knowledge.

There is another quote I often ponder from another movie, Finding Forester.

“…its like praying-what do you risk?”

Jahanshah Rashidian (Iran/Germany)

August 19, 2007

Dear Mohammad

Thank you that you spent you time reading the piece. In view of accuracy, I do not distinguish any difference among religions, faiths, or sects; these are all different products of some men “prophets” who could only have their success in their naïve environment.

Today, the alleged prophets will find their followerse in a psycho-pathological institution, if do not commit any sectarian crimes.

Without being, in a common sense, atheist, I started explaining the universe with other logic than that of any religion. Among the religions, with their different morality, and proposals, traditions… I consider Islam as a violent potential of politics, therefore must be very confined in privacy.

The catastrophic record of the IRI is a clear proof that this religion cannot rule.

Jahanshah Rashidian (Iran/Germany)

August 19, 2007

Dear Omid

Without being Marxist, I believe in this historical conclusion of Marx “religion is the opiate of masses”– See what happened to your Bahis and to other people in the course of history because of religious atrocities–

The question if our existence is due to a universal intelligence or even an anthropocentric reason remains a puzzle of natural sciences and philosophy, but I definitively regect any explanation of religion for it.

This subject can at least be of a whole aricle.

Finnpundit

August 19, 2007

The legacy of the power-hungry and doctrinal authority in Iranian Schism finally became Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the IRI. He was not personally believed to be the Hidden Imam like the Bab, but was thought to communicate with him.

And to think that the French welfare state not only gave him political asylum, but subsidized his living expenses.

Jahanshah Rashidian (Iran/Germany)

August 19, 2007

Finnpundit

This is a key starting point:

When Ayatollah Khomeini was brought 1978 in Neuphle-le-Cateau, it was clear that the man had been designed by Guadeloupe-conference of key powers to replace the, hopeless, Shah.

Khomeini was really a political activist, not an intellectual, or a charismatic cleric; he could not even speak properly Farsi.

His success was due to a very especial mechanism of circumstances of socio-culture of Shiites believing in a saviour (whom face even could be seen in the moon!) and especially to the lack of democratic and secular opposition forces.

Because all opposition forces, except the religious ones, had been rooted out by the Shah.

Omid T (Iran/USA)

August 19, 2007

I thought it would be interesting to mention the fact that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also claimed to be the Mahdi.

Just for conversations sake.

Fariborz (Iran)

August 19, 2007

Omid:

There were and are lots of Mahdis out there. here is the short list of them. People claiming to be the Mahdi

Fariborz (Iran)

August 19, 2007

Jahanshah:

What is Guadeloupe-conference? Please explain. thanks.

insert your comment

Connect with Facebook

Feel free to take part in our discussions and debates. Please be respectful and aware that what you say is only your opinion and may not agree with other points of views. Absolutely no hate speech or defamation will be tolerated. Be smart and comment smart. Read our comment policy to find out how not to annoy us.

Try this!