Martial Law in Pakistan

by

Emergency as proclaimed by Musharraf’s regime is just a pretty word to replace a visibly harmful noun “Martial Law”. Without being partial, it can be easily said that the current step by General Musharraf’s government is in fact an imposition of Martial Law and not that of an emergency.

Emergency, under the constitution is proclaimed by the president whereas in our unfortunate case, a sitting Chief of Army Staff has proclaimed so. When an army chief takes this step, it is Martial Law and not an emergency. Emergency can be declared by a president due to various reasons. Reasons could vary from a harsh natural calamity to external threat to internal turmoil. Whereas, here the general got scared of the possibility of Supreme Court giving a decision, making him ineligible for the seat of presidential candidate. Not that, Musharraf’s regime had any eligibility from the beginning; this decision would have greatly exposed the hollowness of his regime and have further strengthened public confidence in judiciary.

A strong judiciary is a corner stone of every developed nation. Judiciary in Pakistan has always been dealt harshly by the elite and army and mostly used as a tool to gain legitimacy rather then looked at as an institution, whose strength gives strength to the nation. It is in the interests of Pakistan and its army that the country has a strong judicial setup but its not in the interest of Musharraf and his cronies that the judicial activism in Pakistan progresses further. The first one to have got a hit would have been Musharraf and then his cronies would have been left helpless against empowering judiciary and as a result, most of the members of Musharraf’s government could have ended up in jails.

Trying to save its own hide by claiming to be the sole person in Pakistan who can carry out War on Terror along with the international coalition, while ignoring the fact that his actions are greatly damaging the institutions in his country. While it is western world’s greatest misconception that Musharraf is the only person on Pakistan’s soil who can lead the country’s public and the army against terrorism, it is Musharraf’s greatest mistake to have invoked public against himself.

In the past, public opinion was in Musharraf’s favor, largely due to the very unpopular civilian regimes of 90′s. However, times have changed, and due to the greatly autonomous media and unlimited sources of information access, public has educated itself to figure out regime’s faults. And historically, it has always been observed that dictatorship leads to the disintegration of institutions and as a result, public trust on institutions fall and eventually country either ends up with an anarchy or a revolution.

Pakistan is at the brink of both. Further turning of events might take Pakistan to a failed state and as a result, US requiring to take further action towards disarming Pakistan of its nuclear arsenal. Or, Pakistan could revolve and throw the dictatorship away and bring the rule of the people, by the people, for the people. I would not be lying when I say here that such a revolution would be in everyone’s interest except the terrorists.

I say this, because larger population of Pakistan is peaceful. However, due to certain harsh and unjust policies of Musharraf’s regime has made certain areas of Pakistan vulnerable to extremist mindset. Such policies and its effects could only come to end with an end of Musharraf’s regime. However, to attain this goal, the world must help the people of Pakistan by giving a strong message to Musharraf’s regime.

This message should first incorporate an unconditional with drawl of the proclamation of emergency (Martial Law) and then should invoke Musharraf’s regime to ensure free and fair elections in Pakistan, according to schedule.

For this purpose, a petition has been created at this URL. Please sign it so that this motive could be developed into a strong force as well.

Petition to stop support Martial Law in Pakistan