Comments on: The North American Union… http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/ Thinking Ahead Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:46:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kathleen Moore, Canada http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14584 Kathleen Moore, Canada Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:45:37 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14584 There is in fact a PLAN to merge Canada and the EU. I have proof that the Supreme Court of Canada "harmonized" the Constitution of Canada illegally for attachment to the European Union system, in the Reference re the Secession of Quebec. They infused the "Copenhagen Criteria" of 1993 into the Canadian Constitution, pretending that these "principles" had always been there, but in fact they were invented by the EU as its 'admission criteria' for new states. The Supreme Court of Canada in 1998 was largely a Mulroney (NAFTA) Court, which is only to sneeze at the fact that the rest of the judges were Trudeau and Chretien appointees, and ALL of Trudeau, Chretien and Mulroney are FORMER EMPLOYEES of one Paul Desmarais, Sr., a founding member of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, which is sponsoring the CFR blueprint to merge the three countries under one continental government. The blueprint, entitled "Building a North American Community" is signed by a number of individuals, including Pierre-Marc Johnson, a former so-called 'separatist' premier of Quebec. The separatists supposedly want Quebec to be an independent state with MORE powers than it now has as a province of Canada. However, under North American Union, not only will the central government of Canada lose all its imperial sovereign powers, the provinces will also lose powers as they are refederated under the new continental Parliament that is being dry-run out of offices here in Montreal. Obviously, they chose Montreal because if it was on US soil and Americans got wind of it, they're smarter than Canadians, they'd bulldoze it down and charge its operators with treason. Read my 'Statement of Purpose' : http://habeascorpuscanada.webng.com/ Adding insult to the injury of losing one's country to treason, we have no concept here in Quebec of individual rights. No freedom of political opinion. A couple of hothead French cops who thought they were having a good laugh, sent me in an ambulance to the looney bin last month because my landlord, apparently, (and by that I mean there's someone behind him) doesn't like my legal and political opinions: http://crazyforcanada.blogspot.com/2007/11/three-weeks-in-looney-bin-for-political.html Basically, if they are spreading the EU to Canada, you can be absolutely sure they plan to spread it to the US and Mexico. And Canada, via the planned breakup (Secession of Quebec), is the bridge across the ocean to plant the EU on this continent. Desmarais operatives who are detaining my government pretended to pass the "Clarity Act" which is an end-run around the Constitution: it supposedly enacts that a question in a Quebec referendum to secede has to be "clear"; but what it does is enact a power to secede by ASSUMPTION that secession is legal, when it isn't. The Constitution of Canada in 1865 was specifically designed to avoid secession, Canada was intended to be ONE country for the long-term, and a figure of a thousand years was repeatedly mentioned in the Debates on Confederation. The Supreme Court judges know that all this material is in there, they know that the Constitution cannot be broken by secession and that it's illegal, they just lied about it all to get the job done. Wake up, everybody, North American Union IS happening. There is in fact a PLAN to merge Canada and the EU. I have proof that the Supreme Court of Canada “harmonized” the Constitution of Canada illegally for attachment to the European Union system, in the Reference re the Secession of Quebec. They infused the “Copenhagen Criteria” of 1993 into the Canadian Constitution, pretending that these “principles” had always been there, but in fact they were invented by the EU as its ‘admission criteria’ for new states. The Supreme Court of Canada in 1998 was largely a Mulroney (NAFTA) Court, which is only to sneeze at the fact that the rest of the judges were Trudeau and Chretien appointees, and ALL of Trudeau, Chretien and Mulroney are FORMER EMPLOYEES of one Paul Desmarais, Sr., a founding member of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, which is sponsoring the CFR blueprint to merge the three countries under one continental government. The blueprint, entitled “Building a North American Community” is signed by a number of individuals, including Pierre-Marc Johnson, a former so-called ‘separatist’ premier of Quebec. The separatists supposedly want Quebec to be an independent state with MORE powers than it now has as a province of Canada. However, under North American Union, not only will the central government of Canada lose all its imperial sovereign powers, the provinces will also lose powers as they are refederated under the new continental Parliament that is being dry-run out of offices here in Montreal. Obviously, they chose Montreal because if it was on US soil and Americans got wind of it, they’re smarter than Canadians, they’d bulldoze it down and charge its operators with treason.

Read my ‘Statement of Purpose’ :

http://habeascorpuscanada.webng.com/

Adding insult to the injury of losing one’s country to treason, we have no concept here in Quebec of individual rights. No freedom of political opinion. A couple of hothead French cops who thought they were having a good laugh, sent me in an ambulance to the looney bin last month because my landlord, apparently, (and by that I mean there’s someone behind him) doesn’t like my legal and political opinions:

http://crazyforcanada.blogspot.com/2007/11/three-weeks-in-looney-bin-for-political.html

Basically, if they are spreading the EU to Canada, you can be absolutely sure they plan to spread it to the US and Mexico. And Canada, via the planned breakup (Secession of Quebec), is the bridge across the ocean to plant the EU on this continent. Desmarais operatives who are detaining my government pretended to pass the “Clarity Act” which is an end-run around the Constitution: it supposedly enacts that a question in a Quebec referendum to secede has to be “clear”; but what it does is enact a power to secede by ASSUMPTION that secession is legal, when it isn’t. The Constitution of Canada in 1865 was specifically designed to avoid secession, Canada was intended to be ONE country for the long-term, and a figure of a thousand years was repeatedly mentioned in the Debates on Confederation. The Supreme Court judges know that all this material is in there, they know that the Constitution cannot be broken by secession and that it’s illegal, they just lied about it all to get the job done.

Wake up, everybody, North American Union IS happening.

]]> By: sol http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14583 sol Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:19:00 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14583 well, its the same people behind the Treaty of Maastricht, the African Union and the yet to be created Asian Union.. its always the same few people behind the scenes.. maybe they were right about a new world order.. maybe this does sound like first yr pol IR, but u cant help but think that something bigger might be going on.. something that we have yet to grasp.. who knws.. well, its the same people behind the Treaty of Maastricht, the African Union and the yet to be created Asian Union.. its always the same few people behind the scenes.. maybe they were right about a new world order.. maybe this does sound like first yr pol IR, but u cant help but think that something bigger might be going on.. something that we have yet to grasp.. who knws..

]]> By: Nadia http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14582 Nadia Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:17:37 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14582 I'm still really confused about why you think this is happening. This is something that people talk about in theory in first year poli sci classes, it's like Quebec sovereignty, it's never going to happen. I’m still really confused about why you think this is happening. This is something that people talk about in theory in first year poli sci classes, it’s like Quebec sovereignty, it’s never going to happen.

]]> By: bob http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14581 bob Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:08:25 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14581 its hush hush tamara because any integration DEVASTATES the standard of living of low skilled american workers. the minimum wage right now is about 6$/hour depending on which state you live in. in 15 years it could be(considering inflation) 3$/hour. its hush hush tamara because any integration DEVASTATES the standard of living of low skilled american workers. the minimum wage right now is about 6$/hour depending on which state you live in. in 15 years it could be(considering inflation) 3$/hour.

]]> By: Tamara (Syria & UAE) http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14580 Tamara (Syria & UAE) Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:34:12 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14580 Well I agree that potentially great things could come out of something like this, especially for Mexico. But the question is why is everything so hush hush? It just makes me question their real incentives. Well I agree that potentially great things could come out of something like this, especially for Mexico. But the question is why is everything so hush hush? It just makes me question their real incentives.

]]> By: levylevthuglife http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14579 levylevthuglife Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:41:01 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14579 Also, despite my opinions about what the policy should be, I am not sure exactly how fast this integration process is proceeding. I expect changes to occur slowly and that only in maybe 10-15 years will we start thinking of how to formalize things. Also, despite my opinions about what the policy should be, I am not sure exactly how fast this integration process is proceeding. I expect changes to occur slowly and that only in maybe 10-15 years will we start thinking of how to formalize things.

]]> By: levylevthuglife http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14578 levylevthuglife Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:34:26 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14578 Actually I think this North American Union is actually a good thing. For starters, the Canadian and Mexican provinces/states, when added to the House and Senate will give the sane states a majority in Congress, thereby neutralizing the hawkish, ultra-religious southern US states (Texas in particular) and the stupid policies they're trying to implement. Second, the economies of Canada and Mexico are so dependent on the Americans buying their products already that this union is merely formalizing the status quo for the last 10+ years. Remember, the idea of NAFTA started under Bush 41, and got a huge boost from Clinton without which it would never had lasted. And finally, I think this would be an ideal opportunity for the US to invest in Mexico. I think that improving the standard of living in Mexico to levels comparable to the US should be a top American priority. The immigration debate in the US is showing an ugly side of America, and helping Mexico is definitely the best solution for all parties. Actually I think this North American Union is actually a good thing. For starters, the Canadian and Mexican provinces/states, when added to the House and Senate will give the sane states a majority in Congress, thereby neutralizing the hawkish, ultra-religious southern US states (Texas in particular) and the stupid policies they’re trying to implement. Second, the economies of Canada and Mexico are so dependent on the Americans buying their products already that this union is merely formalizing the status quo for the last 10+ years. Remember, the idea of NAFTA started under Bush 41, and got a huge boost from Clinton without which it would never had lasted. And finally, I think this would be an ideal opportunity for the US to invest in Mexico. I think that improving the standard of living in Mexico to levels comparable to the US should be a top American priority. The immigration debate in the US is showing an ugly side of America, and helping Mexico is definitely the best solution for all parties.

]]> By: Nadia http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14577 Nadia Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:46:12 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14577 I haven't heard anything about this though...and I would be very surprised to so I'm not sure where anybody's getting their info from. I haven’t heard anything about this though…and I would be very surprised to so I’m not sure where anybody’s getting their info from.

]]> By: Tamara (Syria & UAE) http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14576 Tamara (Syria & UAE) Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:33:54 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14576 Well I think that is the problem with this 'union', there is uncertainty about it because we have not been provided enough information. We know that something is going on, but we do not know the extent of it, nor do we know America's ultimate intentions in the creation of such a union. I just can't comfortably accept or support anything that Bush says or does, and I would question the morality and legitimacy of anyone who could. Bush and his administration hav caused too much damage and have not been held accountable for any of their actions. Bush only has a year left in office, and he is certainly not going to go out quietly or peacefully. Well I think that is the problem with this ‘union’, there is uncertainty about it because we have not been provided enough information. We know that something is going on, but we do not know the extent of it, nor do we know America’s ultimate intentions in the creation of such a union.

I just can’t comfortably accept or support anything that Bush says or does, and I would question the morality and legitimacy of anyone who could. Bush and his administration hav caused too much damage and have not been held accountable for any of their actions. Bush only has a year left in office, and he is certainly not going to go out quietly or peacefully.

]]> By: Nadia http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14575 Nadia Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:12:08 +0000 http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/11/06/the-north-american-union/#comment-14575 Oh we have trade agreements that are aiming for that kind of thing, I got the impression that the original poster is also talking about one border around North America which would mean harmonizing our immigration and security policies, and all the crazy minutemen on the borders would go home, which is pretty unlikely. Freedom of trade and the free market and free movement of people are always very separate, yes. Oh we have trade agreements that are aiming for that kind of thing, I got the impression that the original poster is also talking about one border around North America which would mean harmonizing our immigration and security policies, and all the crazy minutemen on the borders would go home, which is pretty unlikely. Freedom of trade and the free market and free movement of people are always very separate, yes.

]]>