If all you’re going to offer is laughing and quoting of context, then I feel obligated to tell you. No one gives a shit what you have to say.

Everyone except you… don’t categorize everyone else with you. And when an idiot makes an idiotic comment, there is no point in debating any point… I am not going to debate you when you argue that 1+1 is 3…

You are an ignoramus and stay like that… you are doing your kind a favour so we can all laugh at you…

No one gives a shit what you have to say.

Actually, I give a shit to what he has to say.

Esra,
You’ve completely dodged the point.

How so? You implied that homosexual activism is a Western concept, with absolutely nothing to back it up. If homosexuality has existed way before (it is obviously pre-Islamic) then so has the fight for their rights. I can’t bare witnessing people sitting around and dismissing anything they dislike as a corrupt form of “Westernization.”

Jina,
If all you’re going to offer is laughing and quoting of context, then I feel obligated to tell you. No one gives a shit what you have to say.

Esra,
You’ve completely dodged the point.

Thanks,

The notion that this activism suggests is poorly drafted and unconvincing in refuting how homosexuality is an abnormality against nature.

Says who?

Rampant homosexuality was responsible for the decline of the Greek and Roman empires.

I suppose rampant homosexuality in Saudi Arabia and the Pashtun penchant for raping little boys in their madrassas will further spur the downward spiral of Islamic societies, by that logic.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Rampant homosexuality was responsible for the decline of the Greek and Roman empires.

I almost laughed myself to death…

It suggest that gay people deserve gay rights because they’re gay, from that same concept what rights do I deserve as a straight male for being a straight male. It doesn’t make any sense and it feeds to it’s immorality and abnormality.

Let me quote Einstein….
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.

Rampant homosexuality was responsible for the decline of the Greek and Roman empires.

It had nothing to do with political and territorial disputes, I’m sure. Damn those homosexuals.

The notion that this activism suggests is poorly drafted and unconvincing in refuting how homosexuality is an abnormality against nature.

But do you think that justifies abuse against homosexuals?

I disagree with a homosexual’s lifestyle. That is my personal opinion. But I won’t impose this opinion on others and I will never claim the arrogance to tell them how they should live their lives.

They should be free to do what they want, no one has the right to impose their own opinions and beliefs on others regardless of how much we disagree. If they’re not bothering us, why do we bother and oppress them? Let them live their life. Tolerating homosexuals doesn’t mean you preach homosexuality, so what exactly do we lose if we tolerate their basic rights? It’s not like our societies are going to be overridden with homosexuals, they are and will always be just a minority. I don’t understand why people feel so threatened by it.

I got that message clearly, but I see it as completely irrational and pointless. Facilitate the idea, but be counter to the inevitable action ? Why dance around the thought, and not go straight at it.

Very western inclined.

Esra,
I believe the point you failed to read from Waleed is the that not homosexuality itself, but rather homosexual rights activism was first practiced and derived from Western methodology. The notion that this activism suggests is poorly drafted and unconvincing in refuting how homosexuality is an abnormality against nature.

It suggest that gay people deserve gay rights because they’re gay, from that same concept what rights do I deserve as a straight male for being a straight male. It doesn’t make any sense and it feeds to it’s immorality and abnormality.

Cheers