Mass Executions of 88 in Iran
About 20 years ago, from August to September 1988, collective crimes were committed in Iran. As Ayatollah Khomeini drank the “poison chalice” and accepted the humiliation of peace treaty with his arch foe, Saddam Hossein, he calmed down his frustration by ordering the executions of the Iranian political prisoners who were spending their prison terms and some of them must have already be released. Khomeini named execution-commissions, mostly formed from devoted Mullahs, to fulfil his order within all political prisoners in Iran.
The exact numbers of executions of 88 and the conditions of executions have never been revealed by the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) or by both the media and factions of the regime. Neither have been the cruel dimensions of these crimes mentioned or reported by IRI’s lobby groups in the West which primordially are defending IRI’s parasitic survival.
Different rates are speculated by both IRI’s deserters and rescuers. It varies from at least 4485 names published in the opposition media up to 30000 executions, as estimated by others.
Iran’s political prisoners were simply asked two questions each, “Do you believe in Allah?”, “Are you prepared to renounce your political organisation?” The prisoners had no idea about the consequences of their replies. In fact a ‘No’ to any of the above questions led automatically to immediate execution. Furthermore, according to some survivors most of the victim, repentant or not, got killed because the regime did not take them seriously and didn’t believe in their answers at the first place.
Although, many of those prisoners had already finished their prison sentences, they were further kept in captivity. Some of them were even recaptured after being once released. The prisoners were from all segments of society–included teenagers, whole families, men and women. The prisoners were from all segments of society–included teenagers, whole families, men and women.
During the months of August and September, all prison visits were cancelled; families were told not to bring any medicine or food for their loved ones. During this time the killing inside Iran’s prisons continued. The slaughter was well-organised and ruthless.
All day long, prisoners were loaded on forklift trucks and hanged from cranes and beams in groups of six at half-hourly intervals. Others were killed by firing squad. Those not executed were subjected to horrific torture.
The killing was an act of unprecedented violence in the course of Iranian recent history, unprecedented in form, content and intensity”, wrote the historian Ervand Abrahamian in his book on Iranian prisons Tortured Confessions.
The executed were buried in unmarked mass graves on the outskirts of the towns. In Tehran, one mass burial was accidentally discovered by an Armenian priest who had become curious as to why stray dogs kept digging there for bones. Most victims were young sympathisers of the left organisations and MOK. Many of them were arrested in their teens for reading or distributing an opposition pamphlet or a banned newspaper. The executions followed summary trials and soon included all other political prisoners–leftist and democratic opposition. Many were 12 to 14 years old when arrested.
The IRI’s version of Islam justifies both categories of “Enemy of Islam” interpreted as “Molhed” (atheists), term used against communists and “Monafegh” (hypocrite), term used for, Muslim, Mojahedins. It not only implicitly justifies Muslims’ jihad against non-believers, but to some extent, also killings within a Muslim community, where different interests and power-thirsty ambitions can lead to killing of any outsider “Enemy of Islam.”
These two categories (Molhed and Monafegh) of “Enemy of Islam” Nevertheless, the massacre had also roots in the early years of the IRI, when the newly established Shiite dictatorship began nationwide to crackdown on the leftist, democratic and secular opposition groups. Soon after the 1979 revolution, the paramilitary thugs of Hezbollah regularly attacked, sabotaged and intimidated opposition groups and ravaged their sieges and media.
Many newspapers were shut down, women were humiliated, minorities and ethnics were discriminated, and Friday prayer sermons turned into a place to spew venoms and hatred against any voice calling for gender equality, social justice, democracy, Identity of Persian or pre-Islamic civilisation, separation of religion from state and the values of secularism.
In the twentieth year of the massacre, we all freedom-loving Iranians along with the families who lost their loved children in summer 88 demand the UN to officially condemn this massacre. It is in the nature of the IRI and obvious evidence that such massacres can repeatedly be committed in Iran as soon as the IRI exists.
The international judicial authorities are requested to summon the murderers of this genocide before an international tribune to be tried. Such a process will not exceed their rights. Such a tribunal is similar to the case of the Nuremberg Court which rightfully brought the Nazi criminals before the justice because of their crimes against humanity.

Join the Conversation
How could punishment be determined and enforced without some sort of conflict?The IRI probably won’t let this happen if they can help it. Do not get me wrong, I support such an initiative. However, Nuremburg occured at the end of WW2 when Germany had little power. That is not the case in Iran currently. If the IRI resists and conflict ensues, the innocent will suffer and the IRI will use that as a propaganda tool to further enfore their grip on the nation.
Madmax
A conflict(war)imposed from outside probably costs more lives of innocents people in Iran than the parasitic lives of Mullahs and their killers.
Summons issued by the international judicial authorities have an encouraging impact on the psyche of people in Iran and causes a further isolation of the criminal regime in Iran.
If the humanitarian interests prevail upon western economic interests, such summons will be all righteously issued. Russia and China cannot remain for a long time as the only co-partners of the Mullahs’ State Mafia.
Really enjoyed the piece. Its unbelievable all the things that are done in the name of religion and national security. seriously, when will the silence be broken!
Ray,
An acknowledgment of this collective massacre is still overdue for the simple reason that the IRI rules and its Islamic factions is the self-appointed “the opposition!” Most true opponents were massacred or forced to exile. Their voice is tended to be suffocated by Khomeinists, who are either for or against the current regime in Tehran.
The most victims were from MOK and leftist groups, when this massacre was ordered by Khomeini, all the Islamic factions, also devotees of Khomeini, were silent, if not on the board.
Pingback: Evin e i buchi neri, ovvero l’«oltre-Orwell» sul Pianeta Terra « specchi, papaveri, nuvole nere