Rape in the Mullahs’ Prisons
Since the inception of the Islamic regime in Iran in 1979, rapes of political prisoners have increasingly been committed, although rarely reported. Many courageous victims have recently revealed their subjection to rapes. Surprisingly, however, after the controversial June 2009 election, the losing candidate Mehdi Karrubi revealed that both male and female, detained during the post-election protests, have been systematically subjected to vicious rapes.
After the conquest of ancient Persia by the Arab Muslims in 644, tens of thousands, probably, millions of Iranian female were raped, enslaved, and transported away as war-booty to be sold in slave-markets of Arab-Islamic territories. The Persian word ‘Tajovoz’ does not only mean ‘rape’ by which a man seized or stole a wife, but also means destruction and occupation of one’s environment by invaders. In a belief system that a passive nine-year-old girl can be raped by her ‘husband’, rape, as an extension of such a patriarchal societal control over females, was introduced by the Arab Muslims as the most hideous, shameful, and submissive element in the culture of occupied Iran. Since the occupation by Arab Muslims, Iranian women, who once equated with their male compatriots, have been since viewed as male-possessions, first of their fathers, then of their husbands. In case of rape in Islamised Persia, they were subjected to blame and shame more than their rapists.
Rape of Female Prisoners
Shortly after the 1979 revolution, many intellectuals, political activists, and sympathisers of the leftist opposition were arrested, and many of them were summarily executed. Virgin prisoners were generally raped before being executed. The reason is that according to the Islamic regime’s interpretation of Islamic laws, killing of a virgin woman is prohibited, because a virgin’s soul goes to Heaven, not to Hell, after death. To solve the dilemma, the night before the execution, the virgin is married by one of the guards, and the marriage is consummated overnight, before carrying out the execution. Apart from such rape, the interrogators of the Mullah regime routinely use rape as a tool of torture to obtain information, confession, or, simply, to humiliate the prisoner.
Rape of Male prisoners
The rape of a male victim typically consists of forced penetration of the anus by a penis or other object as has been reported by some Iranian rape-victims. Because of traditional self-censor, male-rape has until recently remained unreported in Iran. It is believed that a man in a patriarchal culture should be masculine, strong and able to protect himself. Therefore, nothing can be worse, more shameful, for a proud man than being forcibly raped. Young men, who have survived the post-election rapes, are now suffering from rigorous psychological injuries. Rape of male prisoners in the Mullahs’ jails has caused serious damage to inner organs of the victims and depression to them. Since male victims feel shame to identify themselves, they avoid medical treatment unless the victim is seriously injured.
It is believed that religious permission of rape, including male-rape, of ‘opponents of the Islamic regime’ has been recently given by Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, the monitor and spiritual guru of president Ahmadinejad. Islamic authorities usually deny that rape is being committed in their prisons, fearing strong reaction from the public, both inside and outside.
In an interview at the Jamkaran gathering after the revelation of rape in the Mullah’s prisons, Mesbah Yazdi was asked: “Can an interrogator rape the prisoner in order to obtain a confession?” He answered: “The necessary precaution is for the interrogator to perform a ritual washing first and say prayers while raping the prisoner. If the prisoner is female, it is permissible to rape through the vagina or anus. It is better not to have a witness present. If it is a male prisoner, then it’s acceptable for someone else to watch while the rape is committed.”
Zahra Bani Yaghoub, Azar Al Cana’an, and Roya Toloui are among the female prisoners, who were raped and murdered in past years under the same Islamic regime. Additionally, at least two recent teen female victims of the post-election oppression in Iran, Taraneh Mousavi and Saeedeh Pour Agha’i, were documented by the media as being burnt in an attempt to cover up the hideous crime.
To shed light on the Mesbakh Yazdi’s permission of rape, it is believed that in numerous offensive raids, called ‘Ghazawat’, early Muslims, under the Prophet, attacked ‘infidel’ tribes; they killed men, robbed their properties, and took whichever females they wanted, raped them, and then brought them to their tribe as their slave-possession. Tolerance of such brutalities in Islam may not be universally believed by Muslims and might be regarded as myth. However, these are the mindsets of the brutal Islamic regime that rules Iran and commits such horrendous crimes.
In an ultimate psychological analysis of rape, rapists seem to come from a subculture of violence, whose values may be different from those of the mainstream. A rapist is often a poorly educated man from the lower socioeconomic strata, who had criminal records. Therefore such a man may be demonstrating his toughness and masculinity in a more violent and antisocial manner, but in the case of a rapist of the Mullahs’ prisons, this is not the dominant factor.
Rapists of the Mullahs’ prisons are not necessarily the psychopathic and antisocial torturers, but most likely ‘pious’ Muslims, married men, and even can be kind fathers. They just follow the ‘divine’ guidance of the Islamic regime, and do not consider those rapes as crimes, and do not feel remorse after the assault. These sexual ‘offenders’ are not accountable for their sexual assaults, because rape is allowed or tolerated by Islamic clerics of the regime.
Rape in the Mullahs’ prisons is not an individual decision of an interrogator, as one may commonly believe; it is a systematic process based on a belief system, and for promoting a political agenda. In the Mullahs’ prisons, rapes are often planned. The primary motive for rape is not sexual. They regard and believe in rape as a routine duty, due to its prescription by Islamic clerics of high stature like Ayatollah Mesbakh Yazdi, and its acceptance by the entire Mullah regime. With that in mind, their act of rape is not merely a question of psycho-criminality, but a justified crime.

Join the Conversation
Pingback: Rape in the Mullahs’ Prisons | Iran Quest
This is a very powerful article. Thank you for writing it. I have posted it also on IranQuest.com
Regarding the part about statements by Mesbah Yazdi, I would like to strongly recommend the following article for complementary reading:
http://enduringamerica.com/2009/09/04/iran-satire-becomes-news-ahmadinejads-ayatollah-and-prisoner-rape/
1. “In an ultimate psychological analysis of rape, rapists seem to come from a subculture of violence…” – which analysis is the author referring to?
2.”Tahmineh Mousavi” – you mean Taraneh Mousavi?
Dear Julia,
Thank you for the correct name. I just changed it.
I live with my boyfriend and our 2 year old daughter and his mother.. He is Persian and I am American. We do not get along well. We tolerate each other. He and his mother invite me and our daughter to come stay in Tehran, Iran for a couple of months. He also wants me to say on my paper work for a pass port, that I am Muslim. I asked why. I am a Christian. He said that it will be faster for me to receive my passport.
We have had drag out fights and even his mother has gotten in on 2 of our physical fights. My feeling is that our different cultures and beliefs are what is causing our conflicts.
I think the best thing to do is leave on peaceful terms.
He says he wants his daughter to know her culture. Which is wonderful. The thing is he wants here and I to go to Iran to see what it looks like and it’s beautiful culture with his mom. while he stays here to keep up with his at home business and the house he owns.
The sound of this idea makes me very uncomfortable.
I would never be without my baby. Especially out of the country.
The films produced by MidEast Youth, documenting the human rights abuses perpetrated against the people in the name of Islam in Iran, are spectacular and definitely have my vote in this poll. I am an interested third-party, a white Christian woman, living in the UK. Thank you. Tricia Neda Sutherland
The Mesbahi-Yazdi story has been exposed as a fake.
The Taraneh Musavi story has been exposed as a fake.
The Saideh story has been exposed as a fake–three of its major sources disagree on almost all essential details.
Let’s focus on the facts, which are grizzly enough.
The Taraneh Musavi and Saideh stories have not been exposed to being fake. Please see the following articles and read the comments which provide additional links:
http://moriab.blogspot.com/2009/08/innocent-iranian-young-women-was.html
http://www.iranian.com/main/news/2009/08/27/insider-independent-truth-finding-report
Neda Agha Soltan’s finace is in jail and is facing torture to change his evidence that basij killed her. So the promsie of punishing those that performed post-election crimes is usual lies from this corrupt regime that has only motive of being in power over any justice. Sadly Iranian blood has become cheap to these Mullahs.
http://www.payvand.com/news/09/sep/1043.html
Just because people still believe a fraud doesn’t mean it hasn’t been exposed.
There are plenty of real cases of repression–like that of Neda’s fiance. We don’t need to play into the Coup Regime by making them up.
Regarding what was attributed to Mesbah, Mohsen Kadivar, a prominent reform clergy, once said in an interview:
where is your authenticated source for the mentioned quote?
Good on you, Mohammad.
Love your blog, by the way. I’m going to be following it.
Jahanshah is writing his own personal imagination down here and you guys here are asking for his fabricated story authenticity? if he had any reliable source he would have put it there, no wonder reformists are doomed always in every aspect because of such followers who rely on day dreaming and delusion , fake slanders and etc etc…..poor Mesbah doesn’t even have resaleh(or risalah) to issue any fatwa on any case and no one refer to him as fatwa issuer
) shall i say LOL@ this article…reformists big mistake again is to follow the MKO false allegations ….so making stories in the name of mesbah wont get any one any where ……. look at this article and read it carefully….the author of this article is just showing his sickness and hatred towards islam nothing more nothing less. reading the funniest part of this article made me laugh for ….”
..
Please don’t write your own narrow minded interpretation in the name of any one here .. but you made a very stupid and very funny line it made me laugh for few minutes so again LOL
regime of Iran is the only a lame excuse for such haters ….sealed mind sealed heart deaf dumb blind person will never see the truth ..just like u jahanshah so lets see if the author would moderate my comment , delete it or he may publish this comment ???!!!…..
PS: Mesbah is not that idiot and to say such things which are against islam and Humanity because Islam is about humanity in an interview….but seems you have had such a commandment in your pillars..thou shall lie ????
It’s so pathetic to say Arabs taught your people to rape, as if they did not before… It’s easy to blame others for your trouble, like Arabs blame zionists.
In this post, you are trying to explain ideologic foundations of systematic use of rape in IRI prisons. your main argument, however, is based on three pillars, of which two are seemingly fabricated. the virgin-goes-to-heaven story (which remembers me of another myth, “heaven’s key given to Iranian soldiers”) and what was attributed to Mesbah.
there might have been rape in IRI prisons, and it might have been a systematic one. your explanation, however, is flawed.
http://tinyurl.com/mw79t4
On the true case of Saideh Puraqayi
Arab,
A recapitulation of Iranian history does not mean “anti-Arab” propaganda. Persians also destroyed many neighbour lands; these belong to the history, but what still remains in Iran is a gang of thugs who rule the country with the most barbaric and archaic methods of those Muslim Arabs who once occupied Iran. Iranians people have right to get their country back from these leftovers of those occupiers. This plaidoyer is now so rightful and concious in Iranian new generation as Palestinians have the understandable right to get their occupied land back from “Zionist” occupiers. Such a right does not mean Islamophobia or Anti-Semitism, but we are facing to a political phenomenon.
Mesbahk’s interview is not still evident; therefore, I started it with “It is beleive…” Taraneh Mousavi and Saeedeh were raped and burnt up according to many sources including the certitude of most Iranian people.
Mohammad Memarian,
Let’s me tell you my impression from the day one I saw your materials in this site. You fabricate falsifications about the nature of the Iranian opposition to the IRI. Your heroes were the gang of 2. Khordad and now you stick on (Green Mmovement) which is another pro-sharia and pro-Velayat-e- Faghih and merely against the hard liners. You attempt in vain to portray the IRI as a representative of Iranian people and your Green Movement jumps on your waggon as a sample of the opposition forces inside Iran. If this is the case then Iranian as a nation are stuck in desperate backwardness and true democracy could be generations away. But we saw quite different behaviour in the last popular protests.
People are not risking their lives so they can keep a better version of Islamic Regime promised by Mousavi. They want the freedom we all see in India, South Africa, and even Turkey, to believe, to choose, to wear, to talk in what they want. They want to have a say in who should set the law of their country. They want a state free of religion; no more persecuting Bahaiis, no more thuggish Morality Police, no more unelected Velayat-e-Faghih, and no more any sort of religious or ideological dictatorship. No one should be above the law, no one should be privileged for being a Sayed, a Mullah, a Muslim, and yes a man vs. woman. If you believe in a democratic and secular republic, join your people and the future of your children, otherwise remain as a “fake” Muslim to fanatics like Samimaneh, whereas as a “pro-IRI” to our people.
I don’t know your background. You sound articulated intelligent and have knowledge. I hope you find yourself the courage to separate your religion from your political ideals, no matter how wonderful you believe your Islam is. Have the courage to propagate this principle amongst those around you too, perhaps this will be a good exaple for lost souls like Samimaneh. The future of your nation depends on it. This a friendly advice from someone who has propbably worn off a few more “shirts” than you.
Mr. Mohammad Memarian,
Let’s me tell you my impression from the day one I saw your materials in this site. You fabricate falsifications about the nature of the Iranian opposition to the IRI. Your heroes were the gang of 2. Khordad and now you stick on (Green Mmovement) which is another pro-sharia and pro-Velayat-e- Faghih and merely against the hard liners. You attempt in vain to portray the IRI as a representative of Iranian people and your Green Movement jumps on your waggon as a sample of the opposition forces inside Iran. If this is the case then Iranian as a nation are stuck in desperate backwardness and true democracy could be generations away. But we saw quite different behaviour in the last popular protests.
People are not risking their lives so they can keep a better version of Islamic Regime promised by Mousavi. They want the freedom we all see in India, South Africa, and even Turkey, to believe, to choose, to wear, to talk in what they want. They want to have a say in who should set the law of their country. They want a state free of religion; no more persecuting Bahaiis, no more thuggish Morality Police, no more unelected Velayat-e-Faghih, and no more any sort of religious or ideological dictatorship. No one should be above the law, no one should be privileged for being a Sayed, a Mullah, a Muslim, and yes a man vs. woman. If you believe in a democratic and secular republic, join your people and the future of your children, otherwise remain as a “fake” Muslim to fanatics like Samimaneh, whereas as a “pro-IRI” to our people.
I don’t know your background. You sound articulated intelligent and have knowledge. I hope you find yourself the courage to separate your religion from your political ideals, no matter how wonderful you believe your Islam is. Have the courage to propagate this principle amongst those around you too, perhaps this will be a good exaple for lost souls like Samimaneh. The future of your nation depends on it. This a friendly advice from someone who has propbably worn off a few more “shirts” than you.
Mr. Mohammad Memarian,
Let’s me tell you my impression from the day one I saw your materials in this site. You fabricate falsifications about the nature of the Iranian opposition to the IRI. Your heroes were the gang of 2. Khordad and now you stick on (Green Mmovement) which is another pro-sharia and pro-Velayat-e- Faghih and merely against the hard liners. You attempt in vain to portray the IRI as a representative of Iranian people and your Green Movement jumps on your waggon as a sample of the opposition forces inside Iran. If this is the case then Iranian as a nation are stuck in desperate backwardness and true democracy could be generations away. But we saw quite different behaviour in the last popular protests.
People are not risking their lives so they can keep a better version of Islamic Regime promised by Mousavi. They want the freedom we all see in India, South Africa, and even Turkey, to believe, to choose, to wear, to talk in what they want. They want to have a say in who should set the law of their country. They want a state free of religion; no more persecuting Bahaiis, no more thuggish Morality Police, no more unelected Velayat-e-Faghih, and no more any sort of religious or ideological dictatorship. No one should be above the law, no one should be privileged for being a Sayed, a Mullah, a Muslim, and yes a man vs. woman. If you believe in a democratic and secular republic, join your people and the future of your children, otherwise remain as a “fake” Muslim to fanatics like Samimaneh, whereas as a “pro-IRI” to our people.
I don’t know your background. You sound articulated intelligent and have knowledge. I hope you find yourself the courage to separate your religion from your political ideals, no matter how wonderful you believe your Islam is. Have the courage to propagate this principle amongst those around you too, perhaps this will be a good exaple for lost souls like Samimaneh. The future of your nation depends on it. This a friendly advice from someone who has propbably worn off a few more “shirts” than you.
Jahanshah khan, ba dorud.
If you are going to blog, I wish you would at least take the time to read the evidence sent to you. Visit the link from Enduring America. They found the source of this false rumor after putting in some time using Google.
The Saideh story is definitely a fake. Here is a link which has links to friends of her family who are outraged at her death being manipulated by Green Movement opportunists. http://www.qlineorientalist.com/IranRises/saideh2/
The Taraneh story’s source is a clique of three bloggers with a history of fabrications. I have documented this on the links I sent you.
The fact that so many Iranians believe these lurid stories means nothing. Iranians believed stories about Israeli paratroopers massacring protesters during the 1979 revolution. Americans believe that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. And so it goes.
@ Jahanshah
You probably know my impression about the protests in Iran. Masses in today Iran are not pro IRI, true. They, however, are not against it. As Lord Kavi once said, they don’t know what they need or should want. The only thing they know is that there should be a change.
I can’t gather hard evidences to prove my impression. It’s just what I see around, and certainly not merely within a close circle of relatives and friends (who are mostly pro IRI). You, however, equally fail to bring smoking gun to maintain your position. The truth will reveal itself one day.
Reformist movement was a good step forward. But some extremists who failed to understand complexity of a gradual socio-political change took over the movement and made it fail.
Iranians are not mature enough to embrace a democracy. Essential socio-cultural foundations of a democracy need be established before apparent regime change. As I remember, it was Shapour Bakhtiar, last premiere of Shah, who told revolutionaries: “you are trying to uproot dictatorship of Shah. But I’m telling you, dictatorship of clergies will be a hundred times bloodier.” To be honest, I’m afraid if another revolution would bring about just a similar regime (maybe a secular one, but certainly as dictatorial as the existing version) within a decade or so.
And I think there could be a road map to gradually achieve real change. As far as I know and understand, first of all, the economy should be revitalized, and it’s certainly possible…
Just a final word:
My father is a devout Muslim, so is my mother. They still hesitate to listen to music, for they find it corrupting the soul. And you know what this means.
You know my dreamland?
I dream of a time during which my parents can go to beach, spend sometime listening to the harmony played by waves, enjoy sunrise and sunset (you know how beautiful it is in Shomal, northern parts of Iran), offer their prayers on time, and be safe in their privacy there. And meanwhile, the young who want to dance or have a romantic session there can be free to do so in their own privacy, without intervention. I expect my father to stay away and let the young live their life. And also I expect those youngsters to let my parents have their own joy. You got what I mean?
Mrs. Memarian / Siegel,
Mohammad: Thank you for your comment and civil rebutal. I am however not convinced by the way you tend to totalise a satus of quo for the IRI or its “reformable” versuion. As you romantically desribed, a secular regime is needed to safeguard your and your parents’ belief before it turns into a more hateful ideology of repression.
Mr. Siegel, I do not beleive your rebutal that the recent rapes and crimes are simply “myth”. All valuable medias inside and outside alike reported these horrible crimes. A rudimentary analysis of Islam’s history reveals that crimes such as rape and torture were the signature tactics of the Muslim invaders. there are many Hadiths and sources in internet proving that. This trend has continued to this day by their (muslim invaders) offsprin in Iran. If you still want to close you eyes and ears then you do not seem neutral.
By the way, who told you that “reactionary Green Movement ” is more reactionary than hardliners?. Was it someone from Ahmadinejad’s Information Ministery or an allied comrade? I want the end of whole IRI, but let me tell you , in the terms of comparaisn, Ahmadinejad and company will undoubtly screw things up more in terms of economy, repression, and social justice. I wonder if you really love Iran and Iranian values rather than an anti-Iranian regime which is now occupying Iran.
Also, let me tell you that you are not alone in your “love” for Iran, but the “patriotical” apologists of this regime with different calibres, have the same buzz words in the mouths. These pseudo-intellectual supporters of this regime have formed IRI lobby groups and institutions in the West; needless to say that thanks to petro-dollars, activies of these apologists are on the increase.
As I told before, the IRI’s dying process is essentially based on a deterministic rule of history which has much in common with bio / social evolution. This is not a conspiracy of “imperialists, Zionists…”, but simply incorporated in the process of evolution because the IRI is imcompatible to democracy. This a simple law of Dialectic, if you happen to beleive in.
Our pseudo-intellectuals do not give a hoot for democravy and secularism while see any change under the IRI. They do not explain a relevance to IRI capacity of reformt. Some others, derived from a toudehist culture of complaisance, brag about the notion of socialism, but since three deacdes do not taste the “opiate” of people in Iran. These are the main two pseudo-intellectual categories, let alone Islamist residents, exported journalists, and turncoats alone.
Since the site accepts my French articles, I am going to put one of my French articles tackling these problems. I will put also a translation of it for Mohammad and other English readers.
Thank you both of you for reading and taking part in this discussion.
It is true that the media in Iran and the Diaspora all report the Taraneh and Puraqayi stories. This is a reflection of how much they loathe the Coup Regime and will necessarily believe the absolute worst about it. Anyone who questions these stories finds himself looking like an apologist for the Coup Regime. It is natural in a revolutionary situation. Bu sensible people should keep their heads and their independent judgment and look at the facts. You do not appear to have read the links I have sent you which are based on hundred of hours of research. Until you do, we will just be arguing in circles, and we both have better tings to do with our time.
As for the Arabs teaching the Iranians rape… Maybe they learned it from the Americans. The use of rape and the threat of rape has been part and parcel of the Americans’ crimes in Guantanemo and Abu Ghraib. The American Coup Regime had this similarity with the Iranian Coup Regime.
I hope we part friends, Jahanshah. You want the best for Iran and so do I, and our hopes are not so far apart. I’ll come back and visit now and then.
Good morning from England. I have nothing of any great import to add to this debate but I did want to say that I have spent a while this morning reading through the entries made since my last visit. I have found all the opinions expressed to be fascinating reading and I would like to thank all contributors.
Kind regards, Tricia