Who Will Win In Iran?
January 13th, 2010I had the opportunity recently to read the Manifesto of the Green Movement in Iran. It’s quite an impressive document; very reminiscent, in many ways, of American democracy, as spelled out in such historic documents as the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. Thomas Jefferson would have approved. The trouble is, however, as the violence on the streets demonstrates, that the Green Movement’s vision for Iran is very much at odds with the vision of the Ayatollahs and political leaders who hold the reigns of power. It may be helpful to compare and contrast these two very different visions.
The Green Movement talks about human rights: the right to be equal before the law, the right to freedom without discrimination, the right to participate fully in government, the right to own property, the right to freedom of movement and residence, the right to freedom of thought, religion, education, opinion and speech, the right to a free press, the right of assembly, the right to work with just and favorable conditions in the work place, the right to unionize, the right to intellectual property, the right for a decent standard of living, the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury with due process and with the assistance of counsel, and the right not to be punished in a cruel and unusual manner.
So what would the Ayatollahs say about these various human rights? Well, their actions speak louder than words. They send forth their riot police to quell dissent. They beat some people and imprison others. They torture as they see fit. They make a mockery of judicial proceedings, and sometimes, they choose to execute the innocent. Actions speak louder than words. My guess is that the Ayatollahs tolerate human rights, but only to the extent that such rights don’t interfere with their hold on power. They readily choose to sacrifice human rights, and human beings for that matter, to the extent necessary to consolidate their strong grip on the levers of political power.
The Manifesto of the Green Movement talks quite a bit about democracy. It states that in a true democracy the people are sovereign; they are the highest form of political authority. Democracy requires compromise among competing factions. “Everyone has a right to be heard.” We can choose our leaders and hold them accountable. “Laws and policies require majority support, but the rights of minorities are protected in various ways.” There should be a balance of power between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches of power. Free and fair elections should be held at regular intervals. All parties and candidates should be able to campaign freely. As for religion, the Green Movement believes in a separation between church and state: “We believe God has no need for politics…the Mullahs would have more influence if they focused on religion.” And as for the economy, they state, “The economy should be based upon free market principles, and its aim should be economic development, increase of productivity, improvement of the standard of living, and achievement of prosperity for all citizens in Iran.”
What would the Ayatollahs say about these notions of democracy? Well, here again, actions speak louder than words. As for the idea that the power to rule comes from the people, they would say that the power comes from God, and as it so happens, God has entrusted that power to them. As for everyone’s right to be heard, they would say that their voice embodies God’s will, and should therefore be heard above all others. As for the rights of minorities, they would point out that minorities are out of step with the will of God, and are therefore not worthy of much consideration. As for free elections, they would allow the semblance of elections, but only among candidates which they approve. As for the separation between church and state heaven forbid, they would recognize no such separation since the power of the state is derived from God, and only they are entitled to define the nature of God and the substance of what He requires of us. And as for the economic resources of the nation, these too, as it happens, have been entrusted to them to do with as they wish, in the pursuit of goals to which they aspire.
So the question remains: Who will win in this existential struggle between these two competing visions for Iran, and beyond? The answer is: He will win who has the greatest faith in the truth of his convictions.

Loading...
Mullahs will kill people to just exist one more day and rule, as they have done it recently by terrorizing the scientist and are blaming the west for that action! Mullahs do not care about killing humans or even they are ready to kill their follow mullahs as well. Mullahs are not human, because when they go to school to become mullah they are defaced and they are believed or mind washed that they are super-human, and so they have the right to kill any human who is against their beliefs or will; this means that they are given a right from their GOD that they could kill. I am hoping that the future of Iran will be a clean Iran, which means the people will come to know that any Mullah is a bad creature that must be re-defaced, either by killing it or just re-brain-washed. So Mullah is not a human being as it is thought.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Derrick Love, Iran e Azad, Jihad Monitor, Michael Stryder, Bloody Democracy and others. Bloody Democracy said: Who Will Win In Iran? http://bit.ly/7NLabg [...]
Alex, I understand what you’re saying about being “brain washed” and believing that you are “super-human”, and that you have the right to kill any human who does not believe in what you believe in. That is why religion is often used to consolidate political power. As a leader, you use whichever levers of powers are available to you. For the Mullahs, they are in a position to use religious belief to their advantage, by stifling opposition, and justifying the oppression of the people in the name of God.
However, there are Mullahs and their are Mullahs. I have to believe that at least some of them are good people who do not wish harm on their fellow man. We shouldn’t lump them all into one group, otherwise we would be guilty of the same kind of thinking as is typical of the ideological extremists.
Instead of focusing solely on who is good, and who is bad, it is probably better to focus on what makes sense, and what doesn’t. To me, at least, the Green Manifesto seems to make a lot of sense, and the ideology of the more extreme groups in Iran doesn’t. If you are a leader, you have to figure out how to bring out the best in your people, and how to give them the best life possible. Keeping them down in the dumps is not a reasonable way of doing that.