What Do The Flotilla Activists Want?

by Nissim Dahan (Israel/USA)

June 4th, 2010
9 Comments

I know what I want, but I’m not quite sure what the flotilla activists want, although I do have my suspicions.

I want a peace deal to be cut between Israel and Palestine, along the lines of the proposal made by President Clinton and Ehud Barak in the year 2000. I want to turbo-charge and sweeten that deal by having Israel agree to help consolidate Palestinian security, because they need that, and to help grow the Palestinian economy with good paying jobs, including green jobs. I want to end the occupation. I want to see two states living side by side in peace, and partnering together for the sake of a brighter future. And finally, I want this peace between Israel and Palestine, this model, this seed, to be the impetus that gives birth to a new and revitalized Middle East, a Middle East in which everyone has a place at the table, a stake in his or her future, and where every child bears witness to the realization of a Vision of Hope, a vision of Peace, Prosperity, and Freedom.

That’s what I want. Is that what the flotilla activists want? With all due respect to the dead, I tend to doubt it.

Let’s start with the assumption that the activists are peace loving people who simply want to deliver humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza. OK. But why not allow the ship to be inspected? The other ships were inspected and the humanitarian goods were sent directly to Gaza. Such is the case with the many ships and trucks that deliver aid to Gaza on a daily basis. Why did the activists on the Mavi Marmara not cooperate in this regard? Could it be that they were trying to deliver more than humanitarian supplies?

There are other troubling questions which come to mind. The activists, according to extensive video footage, seemed highly prepared for a violent confrontation. They wielded weapons such as knives, handguns, steel rods, and chains. And when the Israeli soldiers first came on board, albeit by helicopter, they were violently attacked by an angry mob, and in fact, one of them was thrown overboard. This happened before the soldiers started shooting, when they were armed with paint-ball guns. Do peace activists normally resort to violence so easily? Is that what peace is all about?

Other questions come to mind. Why was a prayer meeting held on the ship with the call for the downfall of the “Zionist Entity” and for Shuhad (suicide in the name of Allah)? Why did the Arab Media report that the flotilla activists were writing wills, preparing for martyrdom, and determined to reach Gaza or die? Why was Senanur Bengi, daughter of one of the activists, quoted as saying, “I love my father very much. I miss him a lot. He asked me if I want something. I replied him that I hope he would become a martyr?”

Does this incident strike you as an example of peace loving activists who want to help by delivering humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza? What’s all this martyrdom talk all about? Since when has martyrdom become a pre-requisite for humanitarian aid? Personally, given the choice, I would take a pass on martyrdom. As far as I’m concerned, God put me on this good earth to live, not to kill, and not to die before my time.

Is Israel without blame in all this? No. The violent confrontation could probably have been avoided with better planning on Israel’s part. And some would criticize Israel for imposing the blockade in the first place. But a good case could be made that Israel’s actions do comply with international law. Israel and Gaza have been, and are still, at war. Thousands of missiles and mortars were launched from Gaza into Israel’s cities, putting some 250,000 Israelis in harm’s way. Hamas has stated publicly, over and over again, its determination to liquidate the Jewish State. Hamas gets its funding and weapons from Iran, who has also expressed its desire to “wipe Israel off the map.” Is it that unreasonable to inspect incoming ships for weapons, considering that weapons are being smuggled into Gaza on a daily basis? Would you expect any less of your government under similar circumstances?

Could Israel be doing more to advance the cause of peace? Yes. A lot more. But advancing the cause of peace should not, and cannot, come at the expense of security, especially when a nation is facing existential threats on a daily basis.

My hunch, although I could be wrong, is that the flotilla activists, or at least some of them, were determined to break the blockade, and in so doing, provoke a violent confrontation with Israel. In short, they were looking for a fight. At least some of the people, I hate to say it; do not want an end to the occupation. They do not want a peace treaty. They do not want two states living side by side in partnership and peace. They want; I’ll call it as I see it, nothing less than to dismantle the Jewish State.

And what better way to begin the process of dismantling the Jewish State, than by first undertaking to delegitimize Israel in the eyes of the world? In this public relations war, a war which Israel has failed to win, what better way to delegitimize Israel than to provoke her into attacking a flotilla of humanitarian aid? It’s perfect. Let Israel fall on her own sword, and she did. And such an effort at delgitimization is part and parcel of an international effort to demonize Israel, and to use that platform to call for boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS).

It is the ultimate irony, however, that Israel is not the problem in the Middle East. She is the solution. Eran Shayshon, who works for a think tank in Israel, wants to rebrand Israel as the fount of “creative energy.” He emphasizes her high tech and science, burgeoning economy, entrepreneurial zeal, energetic lifestyle, and vibrant diversity of opinion and culture. I would add that Israel is a vibrant democracy that for the most part, protects the rights of minorities including her 20% Arab minority. As far as I’m concerned, it would not be an exaggeration to say that if you destroy Israel, you destroy the hope for the Middle East. Israel offers a lot of what the Middle East needs. Israel is one of the few examples in the Middle East that inspires a sense of hope. And for some, that’s exactly the problem. Couldn’t the Middle East benefit from some of what Israel has to offer? And couldn’t Israel benefit from partnering with the Arab world? What keeps us from making that happen except an allegiance to wrong-headed thinking?

I may seem overly cynical to some. I’m not. Hope and peace resonate loudly in the very being of my soul. But I would like to believe that I see things as they are, at least some of the time. I understand that passions run high on both sides of this issue. In the final analysis, however, I cannot help but conclude that the flotilla was not simply an honest effort at humanitarian aid. It was designed and executed as a provocation, with violence and martyrdom as the intended outcome.

Such efforts may make some feel good about themselves, but they will not bring peace. For peace to come we will have to find the courage and the wisdom to let go of some of our closely held beliefs, in favor of ideas we can believe in even more, like Peace, Prosperity, and Freedom

BOOKMARK THIS ARTICLE

related posts

Mike

June 4, 2010

It’s really a pain in the ass to go through the whole post of yours!

For whoever’s sake, just try for once to get out of your historical denial and look outside your bubbles; stop CSI-ing your victims, stop microprocessing the events looking for that little idiotic excuse to relieve your conscious, what you’re doing as a nation is liking sniffing a huge line of cocaine all together!

YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CONTROL PEOPLE’S LIVES IN THE FIRST PLACE! you have no right to block people’s lives to start with! you have no right to occupy other’s lands and then CSI their motives and intentions! Were they Muslims, Christians, Buddhists or what ever stone-worshiping people they were, they were going to a piece of land that is occupied, blocked, starved to death by another force, they got attacked in international water, murdered when tried to push away a brutal force of pirates! THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED, PERIOD.

Stop this, just stop your crap! It is so disgusting!

Nissim Dahan

June 4, 2010

Mike, thanks for your comment. Sometimes it’s so quiet over here, that I feel like I’m trapped in the coma ward of a hospital somewhere.

Let me ask you this: What is better, being right, or making peace?

It’s not a trivial question. It’s a question that goes to the heart of what’s wrong in the Middle East.

Being right feels pretty good. But does it get us anywhere? The trouble is, if you ask me, that everyone thinks he’s right. For example, you say that Israel has no right to control other people’s lives, or to occuply their lands. And guess what, you’re probably right. But Israel would say that other people are trying to control her, by attacking her repeatedly, since she came into being. And in terms of occupying lands, Israel would probably say that they left Gaza several years ago, and they were still attacked with thousands of missiles and mortars. And she would probably be right as well. No?

So there you have it, Mike, everyone is right, and nothing gets solved.

In terms of the blockade, it’s not very pretty, I know. You’re right about that. But then again, it is a blockade that inspects ships for weapons, and then allows the food and humanitarian supplies to go through to Gaza. And after all, there were several ships in recent years that were full of weapons. So maybe Israel is right in attempting to block the flow of weapons. Maybe she is right too.

You see, everyone is right, and we can all content ourselves with the self-righteousness that comes from being right.

You say that the nine activists were murdered. And you certainly are entitled to your opinion. Israel would say that they were killed in self-defense when the Israeli soldiers were attacked by a mob wielding weapons.

Once again, everyone is right, and the peace process remains paralyzed.

Let me suggest this, Mike, for your kind consideration. How about forgetting, for the moment, who is right, and who is not. How about cutting a deal that brings a good measure of justice and security and prosperity to each side. Neither side will get what it wants entirely. But each side will get enough to make the deal worthwhile. What do you think about that?

Sami, the beduin.

June 4, 2010

Nissim… probably you see the end of occupation coming closer every year, the day for our freedom is coming with every rising sun… I am sure suppression and occupation can never last for long, I can see the end of our ever lasting torture, ever since the zionists plagued the region, is approaching, and that wont be good for the zionists…. probably the veteran Helen Thomas summed it up lately as the colonizers can never stay forever, specially if they are a bunch of aliens to the region who can never thrive but by brutal force…. aggression and brutal force can never make your “peace” Nissim, and as shown in the Flotilla attack (as it is its habitude to commit a massacre or aggression every couple of years), israel can only live on brutal force and aggression…. and with this you can never make peace, actually you will never be able to make a nation, but a bunch of colonizers whose end is similar to the SA apartheid Regime !!!

Nissim Dahan

June 4, 2010

Sami, it’s always good to hear from you.

Nissim… probably you see the end of occupation coming closer every year, the day for our freedom is coming with every rising sun…

Actually, I do see the end of the occupation coming close. My guess, probably within two years, pretty much along the lines envisioned by Prime MInister Fayaad. This will happen because it is in Israel’s and the West Bank of Palestine’s interest to make it happen.

What is more difficult, is to make sure that the new Palestinian state will embody the aspirations of the majority of the people. You may hate Israel’s guts, but Hamas is not friend of yours either. If Hamas gets its way, the plight of Palestine will be far worse than what it is under Israeli occupation. The irony is that you may end up needing Israel to keep that from happening.

In terms of Helen Thomas, I believe she said something to the effect that the Jews should return back to where they came from, like Poland and Germany. Well, thank you Helen for reminding us where we came from, and what we went through when we were there. The Holocaust, Sami, is a very good reminder of why Israel is needed, as a homeland for the Jews, and why the Jews in Israel, and around the world for that matter, will hold on to her with their teeth, if they have to. For us, the choice is simple. It’s Israel, or the gas chambers.

…aggression and brutal force can never make your “peace” Nissim,

Yes, I know this, Sami, and that is why I believe in finding a solution based on mutual self-interes
and giving substance to that opportunity by Selling a Vision of Hope.

In terms of your assessment of Israel as a non-nation, I beg to differ. I visit Israel regularly, and as you know, my family has been there some 200 years, and every time I go there, I am inspired not only by her many achievements, but by the way that the spirit of freedom seems to fill the air. And that spirit flows to Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike. Given all her faults, and there are many, I still don’t see anything else in the MIddle East that inspires a sense of hope for the future like Israel. As I said before, Israel is the solution, not the problem, in the Middle East. And with the prospects of your upcoming freedom looming large, you may soon come to appreciate what it will take to usher in an age of peace, prosperity, and freedom. It will not be easy, and you may well end up needing as many friends as you can get, including, God forbid, Israel.

Mike

June 4, 2010

Again, and again, and again! The same sadistic logic that puts the victim in the same place of the aggressor! The same disease that makes the Israelis think that what they’re doing can merely be a point of view!

No sir! It is not a point of view to think that pirating ships in the middle of international water to inspect whether they have weapons, going to a place you allegedly withdrew from after years of illegal occupation, or not! For sane people, and for once wake up and look at how angry the WHOLE world is, it is called aggression, it is called an act of criminals, piracy, brutality and idiocy to name a few!

But you know what, in the glimpse of all that, occupation is ending, freedom for those long-suffering people will come soon, and your sick and twisted logic that makes you believe you’re on top of the world and above every human law or logic will end soon… We are certain of that.

Hope

June 4, 2010

Hi Sammi,

I’m so glad you brought up the subject of South Africa, whose people now call themselves “the Rainbow Nation”.

Let’s hope that will happen in the Middle East too. Sure, in S.A. there’s a lot of bad stuff left over from apartheid days but the amazing thing in this country is: underneath all the politics is a vast, praying rainbow crowd that know that, despite their different cultures, they are united in their love of God. While the politicians and the prominent public figures prattle and rave, while the criminal elements try and enforce an unseen sense of dread, this vast, invisible crowd lives and worships and share together, unseen by the popular media. They are held together by a common bond: supernatural love.

An idealistic dream? No, it’s the reality at ground level.

Hamid

June 4, 2010

Mike..do you want a hug?

So Mike, instead of disposing Nissim’s arguments as “sadistic logic”, why don’t you actually try debunking his claims if you’re such an expert on intl. affairs? Oh wait you can’t because you’re just an angry computer chair liberal bandwagon activist who believes everything big media tells you to.

(Sorry for the ad hominems, just trying to be annoying)

-Hamid

Nissim Dahan

June 4, 2010

Again, and again, and again! The same sadistic logic that puts the victim in the same place of the aggressor!

First of all, Mike, I don’t think I’m a sadist. I don’t even believe in killing insects. I figure that if they’re around, there must be a good reason. And I certainly wouldn’t want to be stepped on by some giant foot if I were in their place.

But look at what you’re saying. Anyone can use his brand of logic to make the victim the aggressor, and vice versa. You simply focus on the facts you want, and go from there. That’s why there are two sides in a courtroom. You hire your hired gun, and I’ll hire mine, and guess what, they can both make a pretty convincing case. That’s why I don’t believe that a solution will come by playing the blame game. In the final analysis, no one wins.

…and for once wake up and look at how angry the WHOLE world is…

With all due respect to the world, I don’t think that Jews, in particular, can afford to take the world’s sense of anger and outrage as determinative of what they should do to protect themselves. There was a time, not too long ago, when the whole world was angry, and the Jews paid much of the price. The world can be a callous and indifferent place. People suffer all around the world, and for the most part, the world could care less. That’s why I don’t put much stake in the inherent goodness of man. There is such a thing, but it often lies dormant when it is needed most. What I believe in is to put the pieces together in such a way, and to sell it using just the right approach, so that people will do the right thing, not because they love one another, God forbid, but because they need one another to stave off common existential threats.

…your sick and twisted logic that makes you believe you’re on top of the world and above every human law or logic will end soon… We are certain of that.

I don’t think that Israel believes she is “on top of the world.” But she is part of the world, and intends to stay that way, no matter what. If you’re implying that freedom for Palestinians will mean the end of Israel as a Jewish state, I would argue exactly the opposite. I would argue that for Palestinians to enjoy the blessings of peace, prosperity, and freedom, they will need Israel, as a Jewish state, to help them stave off some existential threats, such as the threat posed by a militant Hamas. Extremism does not threaten Israel alone. It threatens the very viability of the entire Middle East, as many moderates in the Arab world are coming to appreciate.

insert your comment

Connect with Facebook

Feel free to take part in our discussions and debates. Please be respectful and aware that what you say is only your opinion and may not agree with other points of views. Absolutely no hate speech or defamation will be tolerated. Be smart and comment smart. Read our comment policy to find out how not to annoy us.

Try this!